Peter Horban’s site deserves special mention. Make sure you orientate these simple statements to meet the requirements of the reader, in other words ensure the experience/strengths are relevant to the type of job/responsibility that you are seeking. I don’t think A is true. Philosopher X just assumes A and doesn’t give any argument for it. Set the draft aside for a day or two. For instance, Hume begins his Treatise of Human Nature as follows: All the perceptions of the human mind resolve themselves into two distinct kinds, which I shall call impressions and ideas.
Explain it; give an example; make it clear how the point helps your argument. Include your name on the paper. John Smith – Curriculum Vitae. He could have argued that B doesn’t really follow from A, after all. And you should say something about how the question might be answered, and about what makes the question interesting and relevant to the issue at hand. For instance, is it clear what parts of your paper are expository, and what parts are your own positive contribution. Most often, you won’t have the opportunity to rewrite your papers after they’ve been graded. (Alison Simmons and Justin Broackes deserve special thanks.
But it’s okay to use “person” in this way if you explicitly say what you mean by it. But we will have no trouble agreeing about whether you do a good job arguing for your conclusion. Is your prose simple, easy to read, and easy to understand. Are they reasonable starting-points for X’s argument, or ought he have provided some independent argument for them. When you do this, though, you should explicitly say so.
” “This needs more support” “Why should we believe this. Philosophers sometimes do say outrageous things, but if the view you’re attributing to a philosopher seems to be obviously crazy, then you should think hard about whether he really does say what you think he says. Are his assumptions clearly stated. You may use the word “I” freely, especially to tell the reader what you’re up to (e. This is an easy thing to prepare and get right, and will give you a huge advantage over people who fail to approach their CV and job-search in this way. So tell the reader what it is you think X is saying.
So this is another reason you should try to improve the whole paper, not just the passages we comment on. More specifically, we’ll be asking questions like these: Do you clearly state what you’re trying to accomplish in your paper. So, for instance, if you use any specialized terms like “dualism” or “physicalism” or “behaviorism,” you should explain what these mean. ” or “I don’t understand what you’re saying here” “This passage is unclear (or awkward, or otherwise hard to read)” “Too complicated” “Too hard to follow” “Simplify” “Why do you think this. Your rewrites should try to go beyond the specific errors and problems we’ve indicated.
Main thesis about writing about your experience
If you’re not happy with some sentence in your draft, ask yourself why it bothers you. Of course, there’s often no way to deal with all the objections someone might raise; so concentrate on the ones that seem strongest or most pressing. And the student may very well be right that Philosopher X should have given more argument for A. Your curriculum vitae must be easy to read. Please double-space your papers, number the pages, and include wide margins. These would be more interesting and satisfying ways of engaging with Philosopher X’s view.
How can you do this. ” Try to anticipate these comments and avoid the need for them. Or do you mean something different. And don’t turn in your only copy. Employers will not be impressed by those who’ve obviously left things late. Include your name on the paper. Interviewers and recruitment decision-makers want to get the best person for the vacancy, but they also want to protect their personal reputation by avoiding making recruitment mistakes, which means minimising risk. Keep in mind that when I or your TA grade a rewrite, we may sometimes notice weaknesses in unchanged parts of your paper that we missed the first time around. ” What do you mean by “a person”. These pivotal points will enable you to find out most of what you need to know so as to identify prospective internships (and employers). Are his assumptions clearly stated.
You see, I never chose to be a writer; the writing came to me at a very young age, as a form of therapy at a dire time in my life. One might try to repair the argument, by. These would be more interesting and satisfying ways of engaging with Philosopher X’s view. Or something else of that sort. The point of the papers is to teach you how to analyze a philosophical argument, and present your own arguments for or against some conclusion. Created and maintained by jim. See Murphy’s Plough for example. Keep in mind that when I or your TA grade a rewrite, we may sometimes notice weaknesses in unchanged parts of your paper that we missed the first time around. But neither should your papers be too short. Html
Updated: 6-Sep-12 11:35 AM. The difference betwixt these consists in the degrees of force and liveliness, with which they strike upon the mind, and make their way into our thought or consciousness. Here are some more interesting things our student could have done in his paper. A much better way of explaining what Hume says here would be the following: Hume says that there are two kinds of ‘perceptions,’ or mental states. Your curriculum vitae must sell you. It has to be obvious to your reader, even to a lazy, stupid, and mean reader.
In fact, you can profitably take this one step further and pretend that your reader is lazy, stupid, and mean. Be bold, confident and positive when you construct these key statements. Your grade will suffer if your paper has these defects. ) However, direct quotations should be used sparingly. Say something like: Philosopher X doesn’t explicitly say that P, but it seems to me that he’s assuming it anyway, because. You’ll not have a career history, but you can certainly illustrate and prove that you have qualities gained and learned from your life experience, that employers will recognise and want. Do you illustrate your claims with good examples. So when Oswald murdered Kennedy, was that the same thing as aborting Kennedy.
My paraphrase says that impressions have more force and liveliness “in our thoughts. They record the way words are used in everyday discourse. Also pay attention to the structure of your draft. You should count on writing many drafts of your paper. Or perhaps those weaknesses will have affected our overall impression of the paper, and we just didn’t offer any specific recommendation about fixing them. It’s all in the public good. Is your prose simple, easy to read, and easy to understand. Explain why it’s not clear which of these interpretations is correct. My second argument that not-P is. Paraphrases
Sometimes when students are trying to explain a philosopher’s view, they’ll do it by giving very close paraphrases of the philosopher’s own words. We’re pleased to announce that Heinemann is now accepting preorders for the forthcoming TCRWP Classroom Libraries. For instance, if you object to some philosopher’s view, don’t assume he would immediately admit defeat. If you got below an A-, then your draft was generally difficult to read, it was difficult to see what your argument was and what the structure of your paper was supposed to be, and so on. ” “This needs more support” “Why should we believe this.
More content about writing about your experience:
Negotiated successful contracts for several royal palaces and ministerial offices, home and overseas. In the first place, it’s done rather mechanically, so it doesn’t show that the author understands the text. Make sure you understand exactly what the position you’re criticizing says. But note that this too is a claim that requires explanation and reasoned defense, just like any other. Thanks for summing up my own experience and I’m sure that of many others (except for the getting published part – still working on that.
It is not so clear what Hume means here by ‘forceful. Paraphrases
Sometimes when students are trying to explain a philosopher’s view, they’ll do it by giving very close paraphrases of the philosopher’s own words. Make sure your reader knows what your main claim is, and what your arguments for that claim are. If necessary, you may want to distinguish the author’s claim from other claims with which it might be confused. These are optional, and are for your independent study. ) Also, I’ve browsed some other writing guidelines on the web, and occasionally incorporated advice I thought my students would find useful.
Don’t cut off an argument abruptly. Many excellent philosophy papers don’t offer straight yes or no answers. ) I find that making an outline is at least 80% of the work of writing a good philosophy paper. These are not the same. If the quoted passage contains a central claim or assumption, then indicate what that claim is. B seems unattractive to me. It is not clear how the defender of P can overcome this objection.
Five to seven high impact statements that describe you. These are all important and philosophically valuable results. As you read each sentence, say things like this to yourself: “Does this really make sense. Crucially from the standpoint of data management, web/computer searching, and data/document retrieval – on the web as a whole, on individual websites, on organizational computer systems, and on personal PCs and other local storage devices – the words Curriculum Vitae and/or the abbreviation CV are central to the description and categorization of CVs as a type of document. , “Hurt by her fall, the tree fell right on Mary’s leg before she could get out of the way”), and the like. The difference betwixt these consists in the degrees of force and liveliness, with which they strike upon the mind, and make their way into our thought or consciousness.
If you have no direct business or work-related experience for a particular area, then look for non-work experience in other parts of your life that provides evidence of what the employer is seeking
It could be you don’t really understand what you’re trying to say, or you don’t really believe it. You should never introduce any points in your paper unless they’re important to your main argument, and you have the room to really explain them. See also the tips on business writing and also the techniques for writing introductory sales letters, which all relates to the process you are undertaking. Emails give a far lower rate of response than letters. Perhaps you mean that abortion is a form of murder. Philosopher X just assumes A and doesn’t give any argument for it.
Longer papers are typically too ambitious, or repetitious, or full of digressions. ” Try to anticipate these comments and avoid the need for them. Definitely resist any temptation to use a snap taken at the pub, or a picture of you dressed up as Father Christmas or just about to climb the north face of the Eiger. That’s why we read some dialogues and stories in Philosophy 3. If necessary, you may want to distinguish the author’s claim from other claims with which it might be confused. If you are one of these people (in fact many people are) try to get help from someone creative and enthusiastic to assist you in interpreting and writing very positive phrases and descriptions about you for your CV. Anyway, thanks for the post and hope to read Brooklyn Story very soon. Don’t worry about using the verb “is” or “to be” too much.
” “This needs more support” “Why should we believe this. Philosophers sometimes do say outrageous things, but if the view you’re attributing to a philosopher seems to be obviously crazy, then you should think hard about whether he really does say what you think he says. Are his assumptions clearly stated. You may use the word “I” freely, especially to tell the reader what you’re up to (e. This is an easy thing to prepare and get right, and will give you a huge advantage over people who fail to approach their CV and job-search in this way. So tell the reader what it is you think X is saying.
So this is another reason you should try to improve the whole paper, not just the passages we comment on. For instance, suppose you’re writing a paper about abortion, and you want to assert the claim “A fetus is a person. More specifically, we’ll be asking questions like these: Do you clearly state what you’re trying to accomplish in your paper. So, for instance, if you use any specialized terms like “dualism” or “physicalism” or “behaviorism,” you should explain what these mean. ” or “I don’t understand what you’re saying here” “This passage is unclear (or awkward, or otherwise hard to read)” “Too complicated” “Too hard to follow” “Simplify” “Why do you think this. Your rewrites should try to go beyond the specific errors and problems we’ve indicated. Or he could have argued that assuming A is an illegitimate move to make in a debate about whether B is true.
But the student hasn’t really philosophically engaged with Philosopher X’s view in an interesting way. Make sure your story ties to the essence of your daily life philosophy and the shaping of your beliefs. What can be left out. This was because it was really more problematic or complicated than I had realized. So the author of the paraphrase appears not to have understood what Hume was saying in the original passage. He’s lazy in that he doesn’t want to figure out what your convoluted sentences are supposed to mean, and he doesn’t want to figure out what your argument is, if it’s not already obvious.
Is the structure of your paper clear
My journal is a person to whom I send emails to. Note that some phrases below are connected with dashes or semi-colons. Use technical philosophical terms only where you need them. Perhaps you mean that abortion is a form of murder. (Start with a new, empty window in your word processor. ” “This needs more support” “Why should we believe this.
